Rig Finder index / 14B / Coding assistant / Alaska
Best rig to run a 14B model for coding assistant in Alaska
For a 14B model at this workload, the Mini-PC pays off fastest — break-even ~6 months, keeping $4,015 over 3 years versus Claude Sonnet 4.6.
Same workload, same cloud, same electricity — we swap only the hardware and rank by real break-even. Rigs that can't run a 14B model are shown, never recommended. Compared against Claude Sonnet 4.6 ($3/M in, $15/M out); change the cloud in the lab.
Every build, ranked
| Rig | Build | 14B tok/s | Local/mo | Break-even | Verdict |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Mini-PCbest payoff | $750 | 11estimated | $23.47 | ~6 mo | OWN |
| RTX 3090 (used) | $1,200 | 50estimated | $45.57 | ~10 mo | OWN |
| RTX 4090 | $2,300 | 75estimated | $77.47 | ~19 mo | HYBRID |
| 2× RTX 3090 | $2,250 | 55estimated | $83.16 | ~20 mo | HYBRID |
| Mac M-series | $3,000 | 40estimated | $85.78 | ~23 mo | HYBRID |
| RTX 5090 | $3,500 | 110estimated | $114 | ~30 mo | HYBRID |
Assumes coding assistant use: ~15M tokens/month, 3h/day active, 5h/day idle, at Alaska electricity ($0.255/kWh). Speeds are our estimates; community-measured tok/s live on the interactive Rig Finder and the benchmarks board. Every formula is on the methodology page.
Run this with your exact numbers →